Lockhart Builders, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lockhart Builders, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation

15 So. 3d 767, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 2009 WL 2048956

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 2009

Docket1D08-3468

StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 3d 767 (Lockhart Builders, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lockhart Builders, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation, 15 So. 3d 767, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 2009 WL 2048956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

The final order of the Department of Financial Services (DFS), which rejected the recommended order of the Administrative Law Judge and approved the penalty assessed by its Division of Workers’ Compensation for appellant’s noncompliance with the statutory requirement that it secure workers’ compensation coverage for three employees of one of its subcontractors, is AFFIRMED. See Twin City Roofing Const. Specialists, Inc. v. Fla. Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 969 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). However, the case is REMANDED to DFS for correction of the final order to reflect that appellant is released from the stop-work order, conditioned upon its timely payment of the penalty in the agreed upon installments.

PADOVANO and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARFIELD, J.

The final order of the Department of Financial Services (DFS), which rejected the recommended order of the Administrative Law Judge and approved the penalty assessed by its Division of Workers’ Compensation for appellant’s noncompliance with the statutory requirement that it secure workers’ compensation coverage for three employees of one of its subcontractors, is AFFIRMED. See Twin City Roofing Const. Specialists, Inc. v. Fla. Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 969 So.2d 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). However, the case is REMANDED to DFS for correction of the final order to reflect that appellant is released from the stop-work order, conditioned upon its timely payment of the penalty in the agreed upon installments.

PADOVANO and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 So. 3d 767, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 2009 WL 2048956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockhart-builders-inc-v-department-of-financial-services-division-of-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack