Lockett v. Toney

Fourth Circuit

Lockett v. Toney

547 F. App'x 247

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 2013

DocketNo. 13-7582

StatusPublished

This text of 547 F. App'x 247 (Lockett v. Toney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lockett v. Toney, 547 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action without prejudice for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lockett v. Toney, No. 3:13-cv-00209-JAG (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action without prejudice for failing to pay the initial partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lockett v. Toney, No. 3:13-cv-00209-JAG (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 F. App'x 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockett-v-toney-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack