Lockett v. State

547 So. 2d 1292, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4847, 1989 WL 99710
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 1989
DocketNo. 89-533
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 547 So. 2d 1292 (Lockett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lockett v. State, 547 So. 2d 1292, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4847, 1989 WL 99710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the appellant’s probation was revoked solely on the basis of his arrest for the offense of solicitation of prostitution. The trial court excluded testimony as to any verbal communications between the appellant and the arresting officer on the basis of a discovery violation. The evidence of arrest, standing alone, was insufficient. See Purvis v. State, 397 So.2d 746, 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Brown v. State, 338 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

REVERSED.

[1293]*1293DANIEL, C.J., and COBB, J., concur. GOSHORN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Good v. State
11 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 So. 2d 1292, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2040, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4847, 1989 WL 99710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockett-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.