Locke v. Williams

36 Miss. 187
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Harris, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only point presented by the record in this case is, whether the Probate Court, on the petition of the assignee of a distributee, has power to investigate and decide on the validity of the assignee’s title to a distributive share in the estate of David Williams, deceased.

This is no longer an open question in this court. It is settled, that the Probate Court has no such power. See cases of McCoy v. Rhodes, 7 S. & M. 296; Bennett v. Strong, 26 Miss. R. 116; Philips v. McLaughlin, Ib. 597; Wildey v. Bonney, 28 Miss. R. [188]*188710; and the late ease of Hill v. Hardy & Williams, Opinion Book, 42.

The judgment of the court below, dismissing the petition, is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locke v. Williams, 36 Miss. 187 (Mich. 1858).

36 Miss. 187 (Locke v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Sipchen
193 N.W. 385 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)