Locke v. State
This text of 477 So. 2d 59 (Locke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment after a denial of a motion to dismiss an information charging trafficking in cocaine. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Because the facts set out in the motion and traverse are sufficient to support a prima facie case against the appellant, we affirm the order denying the motion to dismiss. That is not to say that the state could have established its case at trial or that a jury would have returned a lawful verdict of guilt. The conviction, based upon nolo contendere, is therefore affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
477 So. 2d 59, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2404, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locke-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.