Locke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

170 So. 439, 126 Fla. 77
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 31, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree for plaintiff in a suit to reform a deed of conveyance of real! estate for incidental relief, on the ground of mutual mistake in the execution of the conveyance. A careful con-, sideration of the record and the detailed findings contained in the decree, discloses no material error of law or of pro- - cedure and a lengthy discussion of the pleadings and evidence will serve no- useful purpose.

The decree is affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. ■'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 170 So. 439, 126 Fla. 77 (Fla. 1936).

170 So. 439 (Locke v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.