Locke v. Pittsfield

63 N.H. 122
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*123 Blodgett, J.

No reason has been or can be given why Edes v. Boardman does not apply to the assessment and collection of taxes for school-district purposes ; and therefore, according to the agreement of the parties, the nonsuits ordered at the trial term must stand.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locke v. Pittsfield, 63 N.H. 122 (N.H. 1884).

63 N.H. 122 (Locke v. Pittsfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmington v. Downing
30 A. 345 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1893)