Locke v. Pittsfield
63 N.H. 122
This text of 63 N.H. 122 (Locke v. Pittsfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Locke v. Pittsfield, 63 N.H. 122 (N.H. 1884).
Opinion
No reason has been or can be given why Edes v. Boardman does not apply to the assessment and collection of taxes for school-district purposes ; and therefore, according to the agreement of the parties, the nonsuits ordered at the trial term must stand.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farmington v. Downing
30 A. 345 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 N.H. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locke-v-pittsfield-nh-1884.