Loch Sheldrake Beach & Tennis Inc. v. Akulich

68 N.E.3d 93, 28 N.Y.3d 1104, 2016 NY Slip Op 94929, 45 N.Y.S.3d 365, 2016 WL 7399944, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3874
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 22, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 68 N.E.3d 93 (Loch Sheldrake Beach & Tennis Inc. v. Akulich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loch Sheldrake Beach & Tennis Inc. v. Akulich, 68 N.E.3d 93, 28 N.Y.3d 1104, 2016 NY Slip Op 94929, 45 N.Y.S.3d 365, 2016 WL 7399944, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3874 (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.E.3d 93, 28 N.Y.3d 1104, 2016 NY Slip Op 94929, 45 N.Y.S.3d 365, 2016 WL 7399944, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loch-sheldrake-beach-tennis-inc-v-akulich-ny-2016.