Locascio v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

127 A.D.2d 746, 511 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43231
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 746 (Locascio v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Locascio v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance, 127 A.D.2d 746, 511 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43231 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of an insurance agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated October 22, 1985, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On October 20, 1984, the plaintiff was involved in an automobile collision with a vehicle driven by an unknown man. The plaintiff was not injured as a result of the collision. However, after both the plaintiff and the other driver exited their respective vehicles, the plaintiff was shot with a handgun by the other driver who then fled and was never found. [747]*747The plaintiff sought first-party benefits and uninsured motorist benefits pursuant to a policy issued by the defendant insurer. When the defendant disclaimed, the plaintiff instituted this action which Special Term dismissed upon the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The plaintiff was not entitled to first-party benefits because his injuries did not arise from the "use or operation” of the automobile (see, Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gholson] 71 AD2d 1004, quoting from Insurance Law former § 671 [2], [now § 5102 (b)]). His claim for benefits under the uninsured motorist endorsement was also properly denied because his injuries were not caused by an accident (see, McCarthy v MVAIC, 16 AD2d 35, affd 12 NY2d 922) and the injuries did not arise from the physical contact between the vehicles (see, Matter of Smith [Great Am. Ins. Co.], 29 NY2d 116). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manuel v. New York City Transit Authority
82 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Sochinski v. Bankers and Shippers Insurance Company
221 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Presbyterian Hospital v. Colonial Penn Insurance
216 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Kreager v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
496 N.W.2d 346 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1992)
Olin v. Moore
178 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Lancer Insurance v. Peterson
175 A.D.2d 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Roller v. Stonewall Insurance
801 P.2d 207 (Washington Supreme Court, 1990)
Mironov v. New York Mutual Underwriters
147 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 746, 511 N.Y.S.2d 934, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locascio-v-atlantic-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1987.