Local Union No. 626 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. Delaware Contractors Ass'n

Third Circuit

Local Union No. 626 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. Delaware Contractors Ass'n

477 F.2d 564

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 23, 1973·No. No. 72-1845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[565]*565OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the question whether the vacation plan of the appellant Local No. 626 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, violates the provisions of § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 186. We are persuaded by the reasoning of Judge James L. Latchum, 344 F.Supp., 1281 (D.Del.1972), that the plan did violate the statute. See also, Mechanical Contractors Association of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Local Union 420, 265 F.2d 607 (3d Cir. 1959).

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[565]*565OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the question whether the vacation plan of the appellant Local No. 626 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, violates the provisions of § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 186. We are persuaded by the reasoning of Judge James L. Latchum, 344 F.Supp., 1281 (D.Del.1972), that the plan did violate the statute. See also, Mechanical Contractors Association of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Local Union 420, 265 F.2d 607 (3d Cir. 1959).

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Local Union No. 626 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. Delaware Contractors Ass'n, 477 F.2d 564 (3d Cir. 1973).

Pincite

477 F.2d 564 (Local Union No. 626 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters v. Delaware Contractors Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related