LOCAL NO. 666 v. Dennis
This text of 453 So. 2d 1138 (LOCAL NO. 666 v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LOCAL NO. 666, CONCRETE PRODUCTS AND MATERIAL YARD WORKERS, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO a/K/a Laborers Local Union No. 666, Appellants,
v.
Thomas H. DENNIS and Rinker Materials Corporation, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard Siwica of Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal, Suskind, Bloom & De Castro, Miami, for appellants.
*1139 No brief filed for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from a non-final order denying a motion to quash service of process is appropriately filed under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
We reverse, holding that service of process on a secretary in the office of the business manager of a labor union is insufficient to permit the court to obtain jurisdiction over the union. § 48.141, Fla. Stat. (1983). See also § 447.11, Fla. Stat. (1983). Semble: Hauser v. Schiff, 341 So.2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 So. 2d 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/local-no-666-v-dennis-fladistctapp-1984.