Local 621, SIEU v. New York City Fire Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Local 621, SIEU v. New York City Fire Department

181 A.D.2d 549, 581 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D.2d 549 (Local 621, SIEU v. New York City Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Local 621, SIEU v. New York City Fire Department, 181 A.D.2d 549, 581 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about April 1, 1991, which granted the petition of petitioners to direct respondents to terminate the employment of appellants Per Hansen and Eugene Luongo, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the petition denied and the action dismissed, without costs.

In light of the fact known to the IAS court that respondents had commenced the necessary procedures to classify the two newly created positions as non-competitive, we find that the IAS court acted precipitously in ordering the termination of [550]*550the employees filling those positions. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about April 1, 1991, which granted the petition of petitioners to direct respondents to terminate the employment of appellants Per Hansen and Eugene Luongo, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the petition denied and the action dismissed, without costs.

In light of the fact known to the IAS court that respondents had commenced the necessary procedures to classify the two newly created positions as non-competitive, we find that the IAS court acted precipitously in ordering the termination of [550]*550the employees filling those positions. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 549, 581 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/local-621-sieu-v-new-york-city-fire-department-nyappdiv-1992.