Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York

S.D. New York

Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York

DecidedApril 14, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-10336

StatusUnknown

This text of Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York (Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK penne nen eee K LOCAL 2507, UNIFORMED EMTS, PARAMEDICS & FIRE INSPECTORS et al., : : ORDER Plaintiffs, 22 Civ. 10336 (AT) (GWG) -V.-

CITY OF NEW YORK :

Defendant. penne nen eee K GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposals for a protective/confidentiality order and is herewith issuing its own version of such an order as it is empowered to do. See, e.g., Decarlo v. Archie Comic Publ’ns, Inc., 2000 WL 781863 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2000); In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litig., 2001 WL 690042 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2001). The Court makes no ruling at this time as to what material is properly designated as confidential. The Court expects the parties to act in good faith to designate only material for which they anticipate that a protective order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) would be granted. Any disputes about designations may be raised with the Court in accordance with the Protective/Confidentiality Order being issued herewith and the Court’s Individual Practices. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2023 New York, New York So 1 Grosle_ United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK penne nen eee K LOCAL 2507, UNIFORMED EMTS, PARAMEDICS & FIRE INSPECTORS et al., : : ORDER Plaintiffs, 22 Civ. 10336 (AT) (GWG) -V.-

CITY OF NEW YORK :

Defendant. penne nen eee K GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposals for a protective/confidentiality order and is herewith issuing its own version of such an order as it is empowered to do. See, e.g., Decarlo v. Archie Comic Publ’ns, Inc., 2000 WL 781863 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2000); In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litig., 2001 WL 690042 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2001). The Court makes no ruling at this time as to what material is properly designated as confidential. The Court expects the parties to act in good faith to designate only material for which they anticipate that a protective order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) would be granted. Any disputes about designations may be raised with the Court in accordance with the Protective/Confidentiality Order being issued herewith and the Court’s Individual Practices. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2023 New York, New York So 1 Grosle_ United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Local 2507, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Fire Inspectors v. City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/local-2507-uniformed-emts-paramedics-fire-inspectors-v-city-of-new-nysd-2023.