Local 1390 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Lansing

Michigan Court of Appeals

Local 1390 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Lansing

207 N.W.2d 479, 46 Mich. App. 68, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1172

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 1973

DocketDocket No. 14269

StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.W.2d 479 (Local 1390 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Lansing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Local 1390 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Lansing, 207 N.W.2d 479, 46 Mich. App. 68, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1172 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Quinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs represent numerous employees of defendant. They filed complaint in circuit court to enforce an arbitration award which required defendant to furnish 39 employees free or fully reimbursed parking privileges at or near their normal work place and required defendant to reimburse the employees for parking charges imposed on them. Relief was denied and plaintiffs appeal. In 1966, defendant began allowing employees of traffic and city hall departments free parking at municipal parking facilities adjacent to their normal place of work. Defendant’s parking revenue bond ordinance, effective since 1966, prohibited defendant from allowing free parking to any person. December 1, 1969, defendant gave notice that it was no longer going to permit free parking. The collective bargaining agreement then in effect between defendant and the union made no mention of free parking privileges; this agreement expired May 31,1970.

Two grievances were filed over the discontinuance of free parking which were referred to arbitration for determination. June 26, 1970, a new collective bargaining agreement was negotiated between defendant and the union effective June 1, 1970 to May 31, 1972. It made no mention of free parking privileges. July 28, 1970, the arbitrator issued his award which required defendant to provide free or fully reimbursed parking at or adjacent to the normal work place of the employees signing the two grievances. August 7, 1970, defendant notified the union that defendant would reimburse the two grievants but that it would not [70]*70reinstate free parking nor reimburse anyone for parking after June 1, 1970.

September 4, 1970, 39 union employees filed grievances requesting free parking, claiming it was a benefit of their employment. These grievances were submitted to arbitration and the award sought to be enforced by this action was made.

The theory of plaintiffs is that by allowing free parking from 1966 to the notice of December 1, 1969, a past practice was established which impliedly became part of the collective bargaining agreement and was a proper subject for arbitration. If this theory was sustainable under the prior collective bargaining agreement, it is not sustainable under the agreement of June 1, 1970. Six months prior to the June 1, 1970 agreement, defeildant notified the union of the discontinuance of free parking. With this knowledge, the contract of June 1, 1970 made no mention of free parking. There was no implied provision in the June 1, 1970 contract relating to free parking, Torrington Co. v Metal Products Workers Union Local 1645, 362 F2d 677 (CA 2, 1966).

Affirmed with costs to defendant.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs represent numerous employees of defendant. They filed complaint in circuit court to enforce an arbitration award which required defendant to furnish 39 employees free or fully reimbursed parking privileges at or near their normal work place and required defendant to reimburse the employees for parking charges imposed on them. Relief was denied and plaintiffs appeal. In 1966, defendant began allowing employees of traffic and city hall departments free parking at municipal parking facilities adjacent to their normal place of work. Defendant’s parking revenue bond ordinance, effective since 1966, prohibited defendant from allowing free parking to any person. December 1, 1969, defendant gave notice that it was no longer going to permit free parking. The collective bargaining agreement then in effect between defendant and the union made no mention of free parking privileges; this agreement expired May 31,1970.

Two grievances were filed over the discontinuance of free parking which were referred to arbitration for determination. June 26, 1970, a new collective bargaining agreement was negotiated between defendant and the union effective June 1, 1970 to May 31, 1972. It made no mention of free parking privileges. July 28, 1970, the arbitrator issued his award which required defendant to provide free or fully reimbursed parking at or adjacent to the normal work place of the employees signing the two grievances. August 7, 1970, defendant notified the union that defendant would reimburse the two grievants but that it would not [70]*70reinstate free parking nor reimburse anyone for parking after June 1, 1970.

September 4, 1970, 39 union employees filed grievances requesting free parking, claiming it was a benefit of their employment. These grievances were submitted to arbitration and the award sought to be enforced by this action was made.

The theory of plaintiffs is that by allowing free parking from 1966 to the notice of December 1, 1969, a past practice was established which impliedly became part of the collective bargaining agreement and was a proper subject for arbitration. If this theory was sustainable under the prior collective bargaining agreement, it is not sustainable under the agreement of June 1, 1970. Six months prior to the June 1, 1970 agreement, defeildant notified the union of the discontinuance of free parking. With this knowledge, the contract of June 1, 1970 made no mention of free parking. There was no implied provision in the June 1, 1970 contract relating to free parking, Torrington Co. v Metal Products Workers Union Local 1645, 362 F2d 677 (CA 2, 1966).

Affirmed with costs to defendant.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 N.W.2d 479, 46 Mich. App. 68, 83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2639, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/local-1390-american-federation-of-state-county-municipal-employees-v-michctapp-1973.