Lobsenz v. Young

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Lobsenz v. Young

124 A. 925, 100 N.J.L. 179, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 220

DecidedApril 25, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A. 925 (Lobsenz v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lobsenz v. Young, 124 A. 925, 100 N.J.L. 179, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 220 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

*180 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mtnturn, Kaltsci-i, Black, Katzenbaoit, Campbell. Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, HcGlennon, JJ'. ‘ 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*180 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mtnturn, Kaltsci-i, Black, Katzenbaoit, Campbell. Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, HcGlennon, JJ'. ‘ 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A. 925, 100 N.J.L. 179, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lobsenz-v-young-nj-1924.