Lobsenz v. Rubinstein

258 A.D. 164, 15 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6387
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 164 (Lobsenz v. Rubinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lobsenz v. Rubinstein, 258 A.D. 164, 15 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action by infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by her father for loss of services and expenses.

The infant, fifteen and a half years old, was a paying guest at a summer camp maintained by defendant. While playing tennis she slipped into a depression and fell, resulting in injury to her knee. She claims that the tennis court was in an unsafe condition because it was weedy ” and contained holes or depressions. The record is silent as to the shape, size or depth of the depression into which she stepped. On the argument counsel stated there was no claim that the depression was in the nature of a trap, nor is there any evidence that would support such claim. Assuming that the tennis court was maintained in a condition unsuited and unsafe for play, there is no evidence that the alleged dangerous condition was the proximate cause of her injury. Moreover, the infant plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. The evidence shows she knew of the dangerous condition [165]*165of which she complains and realized the risks involved in playing tennis on a court in which there were depressions. (Shields v. Van Kelton Amusement Corp., 228 N. Y. 396; Griffin v. State of New York, 250 App. Div. 244, 248; Restatement, Torts, § 340.)

The judgment in favor of plaintiffs should be reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs.

Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Judgment, in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the law, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maddox v. City of New York
487 N.E.2d 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Winnick v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
38 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Diderou v. Pinecrest Dunes, Inc.
34 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Tuite v. Kruder
29 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Forkash v. City of New York
27 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Desposito v. Roman Catholic Diocese
26 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Speigel v. Jewish Community Center
24 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Hoffman v. Silbert
24 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Luftig v. Steinhorn
21 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
McGee v. Board of Education
16 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Kimbar v. Estis
135 N.E.2d 708 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Martorelli v. Prisco
283 A.D. 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Scala v. City of New York
200 Misc. 475 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 164, 15 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lobsenz-v-rubinstein-nyappdiv-1939.