Lobo v. State of Oregon

487 P.3d 879, 312 Or. App. 267
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 9, 2021
DocketA172973
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 487 P.3d 879 (Lobo v. State of Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lobo v. State of Oregon, 487 P.3d 879, 312 Or. App. 267 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Argued and submitted April 30, affirmed June 9, petition for review denied October 10, 2021 (368 Or 637)

PRISCILA SOLANGE LOBO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 19CV28690; A172973 487 P3d 879

Lindsay R. Partridge, Judge. Brian Conry argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Ryan Kahn, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Perez-Rodriguez v. State of Oregon, 364 Or 489, 497, 435 P3d 746 (2019).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. B. C.
487 P.3d 879 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 P.3d 879, 312 Or. App. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lobo-v-state-of-oregon-orctapp-2021.