Lober v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

141 F.2d 954, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3828
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 10, 1944·No. No. 8563·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal brings on for review the action of the court below in denying the appellant’s petition for an order requiring the debtor in possession in a reorganization proceeding to disburse to security creditors a certain amount of the accumulated funds in the debtor’s possession from current business operations, a proposed plan for the debtor’s reorganization not having been fully perfected or consummated. All that is now before us is a question as to the District Court’s exercise of its discretion with respect to the appellant’s incidental supplication. In the circumstances shown, we fail to see how we could justifiably say that the action taken by the court below in the one matter here involved constituted an abuse of discretion. The order of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lober v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 141 F.2d 954, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3828 (3d Cir. 1944).

141 F.2d 954 (Lober v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Penn Central Transportation Company
354 F. Supp. 717 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)