Lobdell v. Sturtevant
This text of 21 Mass. 243 (Lobdell v. Sturtevant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of entry. The demandant claimed under an extent. The tenant objected to the officer’s return of the execution, because the appraisers were called indifferent and discreet men, instead of disinterested and discreet men, disinterested being the word used in the statute. But the objection was disallowed, for that in relation to the subject matter, the two expressions have the same meaning.
W. Baylies, for the tenant, cited Williams v. Amory, 14 Mass. R. 20.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Mass. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lobdell-v-sturtevant-mass-1826.