Lobdell v. Sturtevant

21 Mass. 243
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 24, 1826·Published

Opinion

Writ of entry. The demandant claimed under an extent. The tenant objected to the officer’s return of the execution, because the appraisers were called indifferent and discreet men, instead of disinterested and discreet men, disinterested being the word used in the statute. But the objection was disallowed, for that in relation to the subject matter, the two expressions have the same meaning.

W. Baylies, for the tenant, cited Williams v. Amory, 14 Mass. R. 20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lobdell v. Sturtevant, 21 Mass. 243 (Mass. 1826).

21 Mass. 243 (Lobdell v. Sturtevant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Amory
14 Mass. 20 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1817)