Lobby Display Frame Corp. v. Steinberg

281 A.D. 678, 117 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3214
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Giving the complaint every favorable inference in construction, [679]*679we think it sufficient. Upon the trial, however, plaintiff will be required to establish fraud in obtaining the credit through the instrumentality of the corporation, as distinguished from the use of the corporate entity as a legitimate means of protection. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lobby Display Frame Corp. v. Steinberg, 281 A.D. 678, 117 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

281 A.D. 678 (Lobby Display Frame Corp. v. Steinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lippman Packing Corp. v. Rose
203 Misc. 1041 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1953)