Loar v. Department of Human Services
788 N.W.2d 17, 488 Mich. 860
Opinion
Sherry LOAR, Michelle Berry and Paulette Silverson, Plaintiffs,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Director of Department of Human Services, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 30, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of the reason(s) for the denial of the plaintiffs' complaint for mandamus.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loar v. Department of Human Services, 788 N.W.2d 17, 488 Mich. 860 (Mich. 2010).
788 N.W.2d 17 (Loar v. Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.