Loader v. Brooklyn Chair Co.

72 N.Y.S. 297, 64 A.D. 615
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case there appears to be no dispute but that the chairs which are the subject of the controversy were returned by the plaintiffs to the defendant, and have ever since been retained by it. Under the contract the plaintiffs were therefore entitled to a return of the money which they had paid for the chairs, unless the defendant refused to accept them and offered to return them. Having retained the chairs, and not having offered to return them, the judgment appealed from is unsupported. There should therefore be a new trial ordered.

Judgment of the municipal court reversed, and new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.

JENKS and SEWELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loader v. Brooklyn Chair Co., 72 N.Y.S. 297, 64 A.D. 615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

72 N.Y.S. 297 (Loader v. Brooklyn Chair Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loader v. Brooklyn Chair Co.
78 N.Y.S. 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)