Lo Verde v. Village of Geneseo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lo Verde v. Village of Geneseo

52 A.D.2d 749, 382 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12451

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 749 (Lo Verde v. Village of Geneseo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lo Verde v. Village of Geneseo, 52 A.D.2d 749, 382 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In the circumstances in this case Special Term properly granted defendants leave to serve their answers. No undue prejudice or hardship was shown by plaintiff except the expense incurred by reason of the necessity to compensate the physician who was to be a witness. Special Term took cognizance of this by imposing a condition that the defendants pay the doctor’s fee of $100 and also assessed other penalties incident to the scheduling of the prospective default judgment proceedings. Special Term’s discretion was properly exercised. (Appeal from part of order of Supreme Court, Livingston County—motion to serve answer.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In the circumstances in this case Special Term properly granted defendants leave to serve their answers. No undue prejudice or hardship was shown by plaintiff except the expense incurred by reason of the necessity to compensate the physician who was to be a witness. Special Term took cognizance of this by imposing a condition that the defendants pay the doctor’s fee of $100 and also assessed other penalties incident to the scheduling of the prospective default judgment proceedings. Special Term’s discretion was properly exercised. (Appeal from part of order of Supreme Court, Livingston County—motion to serve answer.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 749, 382 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lo-verde-v-village-of-geneseo-nyappdiv-1976.