Lo Vallo v. Lawley
218 N.E.2d 914, 17 N.Y.2d 936, 272 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1265
This text of 218 N.E.2d 914 (Lo Vallo v. Lawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lo Vallo v. Lawley, 218 N.E.2d 914, 17 N.Y.2d 936, 272 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1265 (N.Y. 1966).
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs. The grouping of party positions suggested by petitioners follows the form of the nominating petitions, and conforms with the policy expressed in the Election Law (§ 104, subd. 2). (See, also, Matter of Beary v. English, 1 N Y 2d 338.)
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voobhis, Burke, Scilepfi, Bergan and Keating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
218 N.E.2d 914, 17 N.Y.2d 936, 272 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lo-vallo-v-lawley-ny-1966.