Lo Sacco v. Young

541 A.2d 1241, 207 Conn. 812, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 152
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lo Sacco v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 Conn. 503
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 21, 1988·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 13 Conn. App. 827, is granted, limited to the issue: “Does unexcused untimeliness in the filing of a motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial automatically limit the scope of appellate review, even when there was no objection at the trial to the untimeliness of the motion?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lo Sacco v. Young, 541 A.2d 1241, 207 Conn. 812, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 152 (Colo. 1988).

541 A.2d 1241 (Lo Sacco v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lo Sacco v. Young
539 A.2d 149 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)