Lo Dolce v. Franz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lo Dolce v. Franz

240 A.D. 784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 784 (Lo Dolce v. Franz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lo Dolce v. Franz, 240 A.D. 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in plaintiff’s favor against defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and defendants Holman and Franz unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. The judgment in favor of defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against defendants Holman and Franz on its cross-complaint modified by providing that the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent and for the amount, if any, of its liability to the plaintiff, and that said insurance company have judgment against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent of the sum paid to the plaintiff. As so modified, the judgment in favor of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in plaintiff’s favor against defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and defendants Holman and Franz unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. The judgment in favor of defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company against defendants Holman and Franz on its cross-complaint modified by providing that the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiff against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent and for the amount, if any, of its liability to the plaintiff, and that said insurance company have judgment against defendants Holman and Franz to the extent of the sum paid to the plaintiff. As so modified, the judgment in favor of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lo-dolce-v-franz-nyappdiv-1933.