Lo Curto v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 333
United States Customs Court·Decided December 8, 1955·No. No. 59525; protest 224455-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “purified cerium oxyde,” which is not smalts, frostings, and all ceramic and glass colors, fluxes, glazes, and enamels, ground or pulverized, but is a chemical compound, other than ajinomoto and other monosodium glutamate preparations, ammonium silicofluoride, Haarlem oil, and products chiefly vised as assistants in preparing or finishing textiles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lo Curto v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 333 (cusc 1955).
35 Cust. Ct. 333 (Lo Curto v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.