Lo Bianco v. Cushing
171 A. 778, 115 N.J. Eq. 558, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 773
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Vice-Chancellor Berry in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lo Bianco v. Cushing, 171 A. 778, 115 N.J. Eq. 558, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 773 (N.J. 1934).
171 A. 778 (Lo Bianco v. Cushing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. Newman
186 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Carroll v. L. No. 269
31 A.2d 223 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Collins v. International, C., U.S. and Canada
182 A. 37 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Lo Bianco v. Cushing
177 A. 102 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)