L.N. v. Clark County School District

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00495·Unknown

Opinion

' || JAMES R. OLSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 116 WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 1505 STEPHANIE A. BARKER, ESQ. 4 Nevada Bar No. 3176 OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI 5 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89129 6 Phone: 702-384-4012 Facsimile: 702-383-0701 7 Email: jolson@ocgas.com weannon@ocgas.com 8 sbarker@ocgas.com Attorneys for Defendants 9 Clark County School District, Pat Skorkowksy, Kristine Minnich, and Kody Bart 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

L.N., a minor, by and through her guardian C.A.,

4 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:22-cv-00495-ART-VCF

: 3 VS. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; STIPULATED PAT SKORKOWSKY, an individual; CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 47 KRISTINE MINNICH, an individual; AND as KODY BARTO, an individual; MICHAEL +~PRGPGSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 1g || BANCO, an individual; DOES I-X inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS, I-X, inclusive, ~ 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION contained herein between Plaintiff L.N., a minor. 23 through her guardian C.A., by her attorneys of record of the law firm of SGRO & ROGER; anc 24 Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (CCSD), PAT SKORKOWSKY. 25 KRISTINE MINNICH, and KODY BARTO (hereinafter collectively the “CCSD Defendants”), 26 by and through their attorneys of record of the law firm of OLSON CANNON GORMLEY & 27 STOBERSKI: 28

I THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. The term “Litigation” shall mean the above-captioned case, L.N. v. CCSD, et al., 3 Case No. 2:22-cv-00495-ART-VCEF, in the United States District Court, District of Nevada. 4 2. The terms “Documents” or “Information” shall mean and include any documents 5 (whether in hard copy or electronic form), records, correspondence, investigation reports, 6 analyses, assessments, statements (financial or otherwise), responses to discovery, digital 7 recordings, tangible articles or things, whether documentary or oral, and other information 8 provided, served, disclosed, filed, or produced, whether voluntarily or through discovery or other 9 means, in connection with this Litigation. A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document 10 within the meaning of these terms. 1] 3. The term “Party” (or “Parties”) shall mean one party (or all parties) in this 12 ) Litigation, and their counsel. “Producing Party” shall mean any person or entity who provides 13 serves, discloses, files, or produces any Documents or Information. “Receiving Party” shall mean 14 any person or entity who receives any such Documents or Information. ae 15 4. Student records, pursuant to Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act be 16 (FERPA) 20 U.S.C. §1232g and 34 CFR Part 99, may contain information confidential to a 17 } student or the student’s parents and/or guardians. As a result, their disclosures must be limited z 18 ||to protect the privacy of student education records. ~ 19 5. Personnel files of employees involved in an incident may be confidential and 20 private in nature. As a result, their disclosure and use must be limited to protect the individual’s 21 fundamental right to privacy guaranteed by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth 22 Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. See, e.g., El Dorado Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Superior 23 Court of Sacramento County, 190 Cal. App. 3d 342 (1987). 24 6. Accordingly, the Parties agree that, in conjunction with discovery proceedings in 25 this Litigation, the Parties may designate any Document, thing, material, testimony, or other 26 Information derived therefrom as “CONFIDENTIAL Information” under the terms of this 27 Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order (“Order”) that shall not be provided or made 28 available to third parties except as permitted by, and in accordance with, the provisions of this

1 ] Order. “CONFIDENTIAL Information” includes any information contained in personnel files 2 of CCSD employees and/or Information that has not been made public and contains trade secret, 3 proprietary and/or sensitive business, health, or personal information. 4 7. “CONFIDENTIAL Documents” shall be so designated by marking or stamping 5 jeach page of the Document produced to or received from a Party with the legend 6 1|“CONFIDENTIAL.” 7 8. Testimony taken at a deposition may be designated as CONFIDENTIAL by any 8 Party making a statement to that effect on the record at the deposition or in writing within ten 9 business days of receipt of the transcript. Arrangements shall be made with the court reporter 10 taking and transcribing such deposition to separately bind such portions of the transcript and 11 }deposition exhibits containing Information designated as CONFIDENTIAL, and to label such 12 portions appropriately. Counsel for the Parties may also designate an entire deposition transcript }as CONFIDENTIAL at the time of the deposition or in writing within ten business days of receipt 3 14 || of the transcript. 15 9. CONFIDENTIAL Information shall be maintained in strict confidence by the "16 Parties who receive such Information, shall be used solely for the purposes of this Litigation, 17 !and shall not be disclosed to any person except: 18 a. The United States District Court, District of Nevada, or any other court to which ~ 19 this matter may be transferred, as long as that document is filed under seal; 20 b. In the event of an appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (“Appellate Court”) 21 and the United States Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”), as long as that 22 document is filed under seal; 23 c. The attorneys of record in this Litigation and their co-shareholders, co-directors, 24 partners, employees, and associates who are assisting in the Litigation; 25 d. A Party, or an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a Party’s affiliate, as 26 long as any such person agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this 27 Agreement, however, no copies should be kept by an officer, director, or 28 employee of a Party or of a Party’s affiliate;

nD. 9 PIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.N. v. Clark County School District, (D. Nev. 2022).

L.N. v. Clark County School District (L.N. v. Clark County School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

El Dorado Savings & Loan Assn. v. Superior Court
190 Cal. App. 3d 342 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)