LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 2017

Docket2017 NYSlipOp 50920(U)

StatusPublished

This text of LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

LMS Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Lee, Kelvin, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Pamela L. Fisher, J.), entered March 5, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

For the reasons stated in Palafox PT, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (49 Misc 3d 144[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51653[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 14, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI