LMMC, LLC v. Sullivan
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LMMC, LLC, and LMMC HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiffs, 8:19CV560
vs. ORDER GABRIEL M. SULLIVAN, MONI SULLIVAN, DR. DARIN JACKSON, LIMITLESS OPTIONS, LLC, and INFINITE OPTIONS, LLC,
Defendants.
On February 20, 2020, Attorney Michael Mullen (“Mr. Mullen”) moved to withdraw as counsel for Defendants Infinite Options, LLC (“Infinite”), Limitless Options, LLC (“Limitless”), Gabriel Sullivan, and Moni Sullivan. (Filing No. 26.) Because Defendants Infinite and Limitless cannot litigate in this forum without representation by licensed counsel, the Court denied Mr. Mullen’s motion without prejudice to reassertion and gave Infinite and Limitless until March 23, 2020 to obtain substitute counsel. (Filing No. 27.) See Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993) (“[A] corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.”). The order provided that if Infinite and Limitless did not have substitute counsel enter an appearance by that date, Mr. Mullen could renew his motion to withdraw. On March 23, 2020, Mr. Mullen renewed his request to withdraw as counsel. (Filing No. 29.) That day, the Court received correspondence from Gabriel Sullivan, purportedly on behalf of all Defendants, stating Defendants were unable to secure funds to obtain counsel. (Filing No. 30.) On March 24, 2020, the Court set Mr. Mullen’s renewed motion for evidentiary hearing. (Filing No. 31.) The order setting the evidentiary hearing provided Infinite and Limitless could appear through a corporate representative. An evidentiary hearing on Mr. Mullen’s motion was held on June 17, 2020.1 Mr. Mullen appeared on behalf of Defendants Infinite, Limitless, Gabriel Sullivan, and Moni Sullivan. Gabriel Sullivan also appeared on his own behalf. Thomas Dahlk and Daniel Bruce appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Jeffrey Nix appeared on behalf of Defendant Dr. Darin Jackson. Gabriel Sullivan advised he had no objection to Mr. Mullen’s request to withdraw as counsel. Having heard the matter, Mr. Mullen’s motion to withdraw is granted. Gabriel Sullivan and Moni Sullivan are advised that they are now proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, in this case. Infinite and Limitless are advised that because corporate parties cannot represent themselves, failure to obtain substitute counsel may result in the entry of a default judgment. See Ackra Direct Mktg. Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 857 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Mr. Mullen’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw (Filing No. 29) is granted. Mr. Mullen shall file a notice of withdrawal and serve the withdrawal upon Defendants. Mr. Mullen shall thereafter file a certificate of service setting out the addresses to which the notice of withdrawal was sent. Once the notice of withdrawal and certificate of service are filed, the Clerk of Court shall terminate Mr. Mullen as counsel of record and terminate future notices to him in this action. 2. Gabriel Sullivan and Moni Sullivan are now proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel. Gabriel and Moni Sullivan shall each notify the Clerk of the Court of his/her current address, telephone number and, if desired, email address, within five (5) business days of being served with this Order. Gabriel and Moni Sullivan are advised that they may obtain counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, they must comply with all orders
1 The evidentiary hearing, originally scheduled for May 15, 2020, was continued to June 17, 2020 due to General Order No. 2020-08 IN RE CONTINUANCES DUE TO NOVEL CORONAVIRUS AND COVID-19 DISEASE which prohibited in-court hearings. of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to comply could result in sanctions.
3. The deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint for the Sullivans, Infinite, and Limitless is July 1, 2020. 4. The parties shall confer and submit the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(f) report by July 1, 2020. Dated this 17th day of June, 2020. BY THE COURT: s/ Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LMMC, LLC v. Sullivan (LMMC, LLC v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.