Lluis v. State

187 So. 3d 918, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4020, 2016 WL 1039112
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 2016·No. Nos. 3D15-1150, 3D15-1151, 3D15-1152·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

. PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant s convictions and sentences without prejudice to the defendant filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. As the State properly concedes, the written sentences do not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements and the trial court must correct the written sentences pursuant to a Rule 3.800(a) motion.

Affirmed, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lluis v. State, 187 So. 3d 918, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4020, 2016 WL 1039112 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

187 So. 3d 918 (Lluis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
225 So. 3d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)