Lluis v. State

187 So. 3d 918, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4020, 2016 WL 1039112
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2016
DocketNos. 3D15-1150, 3D15-1151, 3D15-1152
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 So. 3d 918 (Lluis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lluis v. State, 187 So. 3d 918, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4020, 2016 WL 1039112 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

. PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant s convictions and sentences without prejudice to the defendant filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. As the State properly concedes, the written sentences do not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements and the trial court must correct the written sentences pursuant to a Rule 3.800(a) motion.

Affirmed, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
225 So. 3d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 3d 918, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4020, 2016 WL 1039112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lluis-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.