Lloyd's Syndicate No. 5820 v. Agco Corporation

763 S.E.2d 251, 328 Ga. App. 862
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 10, 2014
DocketA12A1125
StatusPublished

This text of 763 S.E.2d 251 (Lloyd's Syndicate No. 5820 v. Agco Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd's Syndicate No. 5820 v. Agco Corporation, 763 S.E.2d 251, 328 Ga. App. 862 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Phipps, Chief Judge.

In Lloyd’s Syndicate No. 5820 v. AGCO Corp.,* 1 the Supreme Court reversed our rulings in Divisions 1 and 2 of Lloyd’s Syndicate No. 5820 v. AGCO Corp. (“Lloyd’s Syndicate I”). 2 In Lloyd’s Syndicate I, we pertinently affirmed the grant of AGCO’s motion for partial summary judgment and the denial of Cassidy Davis’s motion for *863 summary judgment on the issue of whether an extended protection plan provided coverage for equipment failures caused by certain types of defects. 3 We also affirmed the denial of Cassidy Davis’s motion for summary judgment on AGCO’s claims for bad faith related to an indemnity provision. 4 The Supreme Court held that we erred in these rulings, concluding that Cassidy Davis was entitled to summary judgment on the extended protection plan issue and the bad faith claim. 5

Decided August 21, 2014. McMickle, Kurey & Branch, Scott W. McMickle, for appellant. Freeman, Mathis & Gary, T. Bart Gary, for appellee.

Accordingly, Divisions 1 and 2 of Lloyd’s Syndicate I are vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is adopted in their stead. Thus, regarding the issue of whether coverage is provided for failures resulting from design or engineering defects, the judgment of the trial court is reversed. Regarding AGCO’s claims for bad faith, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

The case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

Ellington, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.
1

294 Ga. 805 (756 SE2d 520) (2014).

2

319 Ga. App. 260 (734 SE2d 899) (2012). In Lloyd’s Syndicate I, we disposed of three cases, which we had consolidated for the purposes of appeal: Case Nos. A12A1125, A12A1126, and A12A1281. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in and considered our judgment only in Case No. A12A1125. Divisions 1 and 2 of Lloyd’s Syndicate I constituted the entire judgment of Case No. A12A1125. Our rulings in the other two cases became final upon the return of the remittiturs to the trial court.

3

Id. at 262-263 (1).

4

Id. at 263-264 (2).

5

Lloyd’s Syndicate No. 5820, 294 Ga. at 806-813 (1), (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lloyd's Syndicate No. 5820 v. AGCO Corp.
756 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Lloyd's Syndicate No. 5820 v. Agco Corp.
734 S.E.2d 899 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 S.E.2d 251, 328 Ga. App. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyds-syndicate-no-5820-v-agco-corporation-gactapp-2014.