Lloyds Bank PLC v. McCormick & Pryor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lloyds Bank PLC v. McCormick & Pryor

235 A.D.2d 292, 652 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 473

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered on or about January 24, 1996, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint and directed judgment be entered against each defendant in the amount of $19,343.10, plus interest, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Summary judgment was properly awarded since the unconditional guarantees at issue contain a specific disclaimer of defenses available to the guarantors (see, Citibank v Plapinger, 66 NY2d 90). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered on or about January 24, 1996, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint and directed judgment be entered against each defendant in the amount of $19,343.10, plus interest, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Summary judgment was properly awarded since the unconditional guarantees at issue contain a specific disclaimer of defenses available to the guarantors (see, Citibank v Plapinger, 66 NY2d 90). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Lloyds Bank PLC v. McCormick & Pryor, 235 A.D.2d 292, 652 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

235 A.D.2d 292 (Lloyds Bank PLC v. McCormick & Pryor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related