Lloyd, William Christopher

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 8, 2013
DocketWR-79,385-01
StatusPublished

This text of Lloyd, William Christopher (Lloyd, William Christopher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd, William Christopher, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-79,385-01

EX PARTE WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER LLOYD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 68,452-A IN THE 27th DISTRICT COURT FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment. Applicant’s appeal was dismissed

for want of jurisdiction. Lloyd v. State, No. 03-11-00638-CR (Tex. App.—Austin, delivered

November 16, 2011, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he was deprived of his meaningful right to a direct appeal through

no fault of his own. Specifically, the Applicant alleges that a clerical error in the record resulted in

his appeal being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that a clerical error was

made in this case and recommends that relief be granted. We find that Applicant is entitled to the

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 68,452-A from

the 27th District Court of Bell County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 8, 2013 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd, William Christopher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-william-christopher-texcrimapp-2013.