Lloyd v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6188

MARIO HOWARD LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HENRY LUSK, Food Administrator,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-02-3291-2-27-AJ)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Howard Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Christie Newman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Mario Howard Lloyd appeals the district court’s order

accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge,

granting summary judgment to Defendants, and dismissing his claims

filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1982). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Lloyd v. United States, No. CA-02-3291-2-27-AJ (D.S.C. filed

Jan. 7, 2005 & entered Jan. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -