Lloyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lloyd v. State

105 S.E. 384, 26 Ga. App. 81, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 285

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 15, 1920

Docket11885

StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 384 (Lloyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. State, 105 S.E. 384, 26 Ga. App. 81, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 285 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “ This court, hy the constitutional amendment creating it, is limited in jurisdiction to the correction oí errors in law alone, and therefore has no power to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is strongly contrary to the weight of evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support it.” Collins v. Broom, 21 Ga. App. 420 (1) (94 S. E. 645), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., mid Luke, J., concur. I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Penal Code (1910), §§ 715, 716; Ga. App. Reports, 13/10(2); Id. 586(1); 15/642; 16/216; 17/752; 18/700, 702.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI