Lloyd v. Regisford

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 11, 2022·No. 7:22-cv-03744·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONNELL LLOYD, Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE

-against- 22-CV-03744 (PMH) H.O. REGISFORD, et al., Defendants. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated at Auburn Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his rights while he was confined at Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Ossining, New York. Plaintiff was granted leave to provide in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on June 22, 2022. (Doc. 5).1 DISCUSSION A. Service on the Named Defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)).

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Hearing Officer Regisford, Sergeant Montgomery, Correction Officer S. Kerr, Correction Officer Mowatt, and Correction Officer Williams through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for these Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the

paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. John Doe Defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies

sufficient information to permit the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) to identify the John Doe correction officers who were involved in the incidents Plaintiff described that occurred on November 17, 2021, at Sing Sing Correctional Facility. It is therefore ordered that the New York State Attorney General, who is the attorney for and agent of DOCCS, must ascertain the identity and badge number of each John Doe whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the addresses where the defendants may be served. The New York State Attorney General must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this Order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe defendants. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An amended complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this Order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an Order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with

the addresses for the named John Doe defendants and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. C. Local Civil Rule 33.2 Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. Those discovery requests are available on the Court’s website under “Forms” and are titled “Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents.” Within 120 days of service of the complaint, Defendants must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In their responses, Defendants must quote each request verbatim.3

CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses for Defendants Regisford, Montgomery, Kerr, Mowatt, and Williams, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these individuals, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the complaint to the New York State Attorney General at: 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005. An amended complaint form is attached to this Order.

3 If Plaintiff would like copies of these discovery requests before receiving the responses and does not have access to the website, Plaintiff may request them from the Pro Se Intake Unit. Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to this action. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2022 White Plains, New York PHILIP M. HALPERN United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES Hearing Officer Regisford Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562 Sergeant Montgomery Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562 Correction Officer S. Kerr Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562 Correction Officer Mowatt Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562 Correction Officer Williams Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, New York 10562 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CV. Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned) AMENDED against: COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? 0mNd—MN L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See

Lloyd v. Regisford, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Lloyd v. Regisford (Lloyd v. Regisford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)