Lloyd v. Parziale

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lloyd v. Parziale

203 Misc. 399, 119 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2234

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1952

StatusPublished

This text of 203 Misc. 399 (Lloyd v. Parziale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. Parziale, 203 Misc. 399, 119 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Parcel checkroom attendants employed in an interstate bus terminal, checking and handling baggage for interstate passengers, are engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.). As such they are entitled to the benefits for unpaid minimum wages and unpaid overtime compensation therein provided (Act, § 3, subd. [b] ; § 6, subd. [a]; § 7, subd. [a] and § 16, subd. [b]; U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 203, subd. [b], § 206, subd. [a], § 207, subd. [a], § 216, subd. [b]).

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Hammer, Hofstadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Parcel checkroom attendants employed in an interstate bus terminal, checking and handling baggage for interstate passengers, are engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.). As such they are entitled to the benefits for unpaid minimum wages and unpaid overtime compensation therein provided (Act, § 3, subd. [b] ; § 6, subd. [a]; § 7, subd. [a] and § 16, subd. [b]; U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 203, subd. [b], § 206, subd. [a], § 207, subd. [a], § 216, subd. [b]).

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Hammer, Hofstadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 Misc. 399, 119 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-parziale-nyappterm-1952.