Lloyd v. Mullenex

District Court, N.D. California·Decided February 19, 2020·No. 5:19-cv-03999·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 KENNETH LLOYD, Case No.19-cv-03360-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL S 12 Re: Dkt. No. 37 E KEVIN MULLENEX 13 Defendant.

Q 16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that 5 17 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

18 } action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 19 Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 20 case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are 21 VACATED. 22 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 23 Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 25 26 Dated: February 19, 2020 hGe<——— —_—> NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 27 United States Magistrate Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lloyd v. Mullenex, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Lloyd v. Mullenex (Lloyd v. Mullenex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)