Lloyd v. Miller
This text of Lloyd v. Miller (Lloyd v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6973
GRADY EDWARD LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE JUDGE EDWARD W. MILLER, Greenville County; ATTORNEY JEFFREY M. SCHLIZ; SOUTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS; EDWIN BROWN PARKINSON, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge. (9:08-cv-00675-DCN)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Grady Edward Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lloyd v. Miller, No. 9:08-cv-00675-DCN (D.S.C. May 8, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Lloyd’s motion for transcript at government expense is denied.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lloyd v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-miller-ca4-2008.