Lloyd v. McWilliams
137 U.S. 576, 11 S. Ct. 173, 34 L. Ed. 788, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2120
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this cause, trial by jury was waived by agreement of the parties in writing, duly filed, and the case was tried by the court. But the record discloses no finding upon the facts, either general or special, in accordance with the statute, (B.ev. Stat. §§ 649, 7Ó0,) and no questions are therefore open to our revision as an appellate tribunal.
As the Circuit Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties, its judgment must be presumed to be right, and on that ground Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lloyd v. McWilliams, 137 U.S. 576, 11 S. Ct. 173, 34 L. Ed. 788, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2120 (1890).
137 U.S. 576 (Lloyd v. McWilliams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Becker v. Evens & Howard Sewer Pipe Co.
70 F.2d 596 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
Hartford Fire Ins. v. War Eagle Coal Co.
295 F. 663 (Fourth Circuit, 1924)
Francheschi v. Jones
8 P.R. Fed. 632 (D. Puerto Rico, 1916)
Hosler v. Ireland
219 F. 489 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Fellman v. Royal Ins.
185 F. 689 (Fifth Circuit, 1911)
Fellman v. Royal Ins. Co.
184 F. 577 (Fifth Circuit, 1911)
Saltonstall, Collector of Customs v. Birtwell
150 U.S. 417 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Saltonstall v. Birtwell
150 U.S. 417 (Supreme Court, 1893)
British Queen Mining Co. v. Baker Silver Mining Co.
139 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1891)
British Queen Min. Co. Of Colorado v. Baker Silver Min. Co
139 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1891)