Lloyd v. Lovell
This text of Lloyd v. Lovell (Lloyd v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6149
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
I. B. LOVELL; D. D. GRONAU,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03174-H)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action raising
allegations of defamation. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Lovell, No. 5:08-ct-
03174-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009). We deny as moot Lloyd’s
motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lloyd v. Lovell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-lovell-ca4-2009.