Lloyd v. Lloyd

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Lloyd v. Lloyd

31 S.C. Eq. 469

DecidedFebruary 15, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 31 S.C. Eq. 469 (Lloyd v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. Lloyd, 31 S.C. Eq. 469 (S.C. Ct. App. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Dunkin, Ch.

This Court is of opinion that the case cannot be distinguished in principle from Henry vs. Graham, 9 Rich. Eq. 100.

It is ordered and decreed that the decree of the Circuit Court be reversed; that the exception to the Master’s report be sustained, and that the accounts he reformed accordingly.

Johnston and Wardlaw, CC., concurred.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Dunkin, Ch.

This Court is of opinion that the case cannot be distinguished in principle from Henry vs. Graham, 9 Rich. Eq. 100.

It is ordered and decreed that the decree of the Circuit Court be reversed; that the exception to the Master’s report be sustained, and that the accounts he reformed accordingly.

Johnston and Wardlaw, CC., concurred.

Decree reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 S.C. Eq. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-lloyd-scctapp-1858.