Lloyd v. Jordan

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2009
Docket08-8377
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lloyd v. Jordan (Lloyd v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd v. Jordan, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8377

ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CONNIE JORDAN; JUDGE J. HOCKENBURY; JUDGE LANIER; RODDEY BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03119-D)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v.

Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd v. Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-jordan-ca4-2009.