Lloyd v. Jordan
This text of Lloyd v. Jordan (Lloyd v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8377
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONNIE JORDAN; JUDGE J. HOCKENBURY; JUDGE LANIER; RODDEY BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03119-D)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v.
Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lloyd v. Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-jordan-ca4-2009.