Lloyd v. H. T. E. Beardsley, Inc.
This text of 258 A.D. 954 (Lloyd v. H. T. E. Beardsley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner previously instituted a derivative stockholder’s action in which he moved for discovery of the corporate books and was granted such examination, which was limited in, scope [955]*955because of his alleged position as a competitor in business of the company. Under the circumstances, an order in the nature of mandamus for a further inspection of the books by petitioner as a stockholder was improperly granted. Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 954, 17 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-h-t-e-beardsley-inc-nyappdiv-1940.