Lloyd v. Greenberg
This text of 108 S.E.2d 597 (Lloyd v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conclusion reached is that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, presented a case for jury determination on the issues ‘submitted. Moreover, consideration of the assignments of error brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. As to the reduction of the verdict on the third issue, with plaintiff’s consent, see Caudle v. Swanson, 248 N.C. 249, 103 S.E. 2d 357, and cases cited.
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.E.2d 597, 250 N.C. 374, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-greenberg-nc-1959.