Lloyd v. Greenberg
108 S.E.2d 597, 250 N.C. 374, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 652
Opinion
The conclusion reached is that the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, presented a case for jury determination on the issues ‘submitted. Moreover, consideration of the assignments of error brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. As to the reduction of the verdict on the third issue, with plaintiff’s consent, see Caudle v. Swanson, 248 N.C. 249, 103 S.E. 2d 357, and cases cited.
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lloyd v. Greenberg, 108 S.E.2d 597, 250 N.C. 374, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 652 (N.C. 1959).
108 S.E.2d 597 (Lloyd v. Greenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caudle v. Swanson
103 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)