Lloyd v. Eagleton

Fourth Circuit

Lloyd v. Eagleton

308 F. App'x 699

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 2009

DocketNo. 08-7814

StatusPublished

This text of 308 F. App'x 699 (Lloyd v. Eagleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. Eagleton, 308 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the [700]*700record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Eagleton, No. 9:07-cv-01416-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the [700]*700record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Eagleton, No. 9:07-cv-01416-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 F. App'x 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-eagleton-ca4-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack