Lloyd v. Corcoran

Fourth Circuit

Lloyd v. Corcoran

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40418, 1995 WL 758398

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1995

Docket94-7234

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Lloyd v. Corcoran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lloyd v. Corcoran, 73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40418, 1995 WL 758398 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas CORCORAN, Warden, Individually and in his official
capacity as the Warden of Maryland Correctional; John
Parker, Individually and in his official capacity; Richard
Lanham, Sr., Commissioner, Individually and in his official
capacity; Shawn Jackson; Russell W. Selig; Ernest L.
Elliott; Curtis D. Kime; James Moore; Michael Reichert;
John M. Price; Franklin D. Wood, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Audrey J.S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Corcoran, No. CA-94-227-B (D.Md. Oct. 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Winston LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas CORCORAN, Warden, Individually and in his official
capacity as the Warden of Maryland Correctional; John
Parker, Individually and in his official capacity; Richard
Lanham, Sr., Commissioner, Individually and in his official
capacity; Shawn Jackson; Russell W. Selig; Ernest L.
Elliott; Curtis D. Kime; James Moore; Michael Reichert;
John M. Price; Franklin D. Wood, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7234.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 14, 1995.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Audrey J.S. Carrion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Corcoran, No. CA-94-227-B (D.Md. Oct. 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40418, 1995 WL 758398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-corcoran-ca4-1995.