Lloyd v. Condon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2001
Docket19-1586
StatusUnpublished

This text of Lloyd v. Condon (Lloyd v. Condon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lloyd v. Condon, (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7465

TIMOTHY LUXURIOUS X LLOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COR- RECTIONS; BARNEY S. LOYD, JR., Acting Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-01-835-9-8RB)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Timothy Luxurious X Lloyd seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason-

ing of the district court. See Lloyd v. Condon, No. CA-01-835-9-

8RB (D.S.C. June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lloyd v. Condon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lloyd-v-condon-ca4-2001.